← All products
Free edition · Firm Intelligence

The Firms That Move Austin

A ten-year leaderboard of entitlement representation at the Planning Commission and Zoning & Platting Commission, 2016–2026.
Free
Read below · download the PDF · share with attribution
Download the PDF →

One firm appears in roughly one of every seven agent-attributed Austin entitlement hearings.

Austin Development Watch maintains a structured record of every Planning Commission and Zoning & Platting Commission case in the public record — thousands of hearings since 2016, each tagged to the agent of record. That record answers a question the market has never had a clean answer to: which firms actually carry Austin’s entitlement docket?

The ten-year leaderboard

#Firm10-yr hearingsApproved*Postponed*Lead attorneys (hearings)
1Drenner Group63239.7%59.1%Amanda Swor (309), Leah Bojo (266), Dave Anderson (44)
2Armbrust & Brown49034.5%64.8%Richard Suttle (224), Michael Whellan (166)
3Thrower Design38835.4%62.3%Ron Thrower (294), Victoria Haase (90)
4Alice Glasco Consulting22639.4%59.7%Alice Glasco (226)
5Husch Blackwell13123.2%75.2%Nikelle Meade (98), Stacey Milazzo (31)
6DuBois Bryant & Campbell9743.8%53.1%David Hartman (95)
7LJA Engineering9064.9%21.6%T. Walter Hoysa (25), Russell Kotara (20)
8Land Use Solutions7531.0%69.0%Michele Haussmann (75)
9Metcalfe Wolff Stuart & Williams7157.7%42.3%Michele Rogerson Lynch (63)
10BGE5273.9%8.7%Brian Grace (13), Chris Rawls (13)

*Method: agent-attributed hearing rows at Austin PC + ZAP, 2016–June 2026, from ADW’s structured case database (~5,190 hearings; ~4,413 carry an attributed agent). “Approved” and “Postponed” are shares of decided outcomes (recommended/approved vs. postponed/indefinitely postponed), excluding still-pending items; with denials they total 100%. A “hearing” is one appearance of a case before a commission; a single project can generate several. Firm totals are reconciled to the case level and recomputed weekly — every figure traces to a record.

What the leaderboard says

The market is concentrated at the top and long-tailed below. The four busiest firms — Drenner Group, Armbrust & Brown, Thrower Design and Alice Glasco Consulting — together carry nearly two of every five agent-attributed hearings (39%); everyone below operates as a boutique. Drenner sits clearly at #1, and within it just two attorneys — Amanda Swor and Leah Bojo — account for roughly 91% of the firm’s pipeline.

The sharper signal is in the outcome columns. Among the volume leaders the dominant result is neither approval nor denial — it is postponement: Drenner 59%, Armbrust 65%, Thrower 62%, with the zoning boutiques higher still. The exceptions are the engineering and site-plan firms — LJA (65% approved, 22% postponed), BGE (74% / 9%) — which clear fast with little continuance. The dividing line is the work: discretionary zoning moves slowly and gets continued; by-right engineering clears. For anyone selecting counsel, benchmarking a competitor, or underwriting how long a case will take, the firm on the filing is signal — and now it is measurable.

Built from public records (agendas, minutes, and meeting video). Figures trace to the Austin Development Watch structured dataset. Free to read and share with attribution. © 2026 Texas Entitlement / Austin Development Watch · [email protected]